binding to tim3 (ACROBiosystems)
Structured Review

Binding To Tim3, supplied by ACROBiosystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/binding to tim3/product/ACROBiosystems
Average 94 stars, based on 6 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "AI-enhanced profiling of phage-display-identified anti-TIM3 and anti-TIGIT novel antibodies"
Article Title: AI-enhanced profiling of phage-display-identified anti-TIM3 and anti-TIGIT novel antibodies
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1499810
Figure Legend Snippet: Binding validation and specificity assessment of the 5 final candidates. The 5 final candidates and the reference antibodies were produced as human IgG1 in HEK293 supernatant, concentrated and dosed. (A, B) : Binding validation. For HTRF assays, the recombinant extracellular domains of TIM3 (A) or TIGIT (B) fused to a biotinylated Avitag were incubated with increasing concentrations of the antibodies. Antibodies and targets were detected with fluorophore-coupled sensors: d2 acceptor coupled to an anti-IgG and terbium donor coupled to the streptavidin. The binding was assessed as the energy transfer between the donor and acceptor and computed as the HTRF ratio: 665nm acceptor emission/620 nm donor emission x 10,000. Curves were fitted mathematically with GraphPad Prism software. (C) Specificity evaluation of the candidates. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with the Flag-tagged target gene and incubated with the candidate or reference antibodies. The target expression was monitored with a PE-coupled anti-Flag antibody and the binding of the antibodies was followed with an APC-coupled anti-IgG. Percentage of APC+ PE+ cells among the total PE+ cell population was indicated through a color gradient. (D–F) Binding of endogenous TIM3 by 6E9 in immune-relevant cells. NK lines NKL and NK-92 (D) , activated PBMC (E) and TRM cultured with TGF-β1 and IL-15 (F) were incubated with 6E9 or 7KQL as a control. The T and NK lymphocytes subsets of the PBMC and TRM were optically isolated after staining of CD3 and CD56 (CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD3-CD56+ NK lymphocytes).
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Produced, Recombinant, Incubation, Software, Transfection, Expressing, Cell Culture, Control, Isolation, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Binding constants.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Post-translation modifications analysis. (A) PTM motifs shown on VH-VL 3D representations. The main PTM-prone residues of the identified deamidation, isomerization, and methionine or tryptophan oxidation sites are shown in colored spheres. The antibodies surfaces are shown in grey (frameworks) and pale green (CDRs). (B, C) Comparison with INN antibodies. The number of PTM motifs with solvent accessibility higher than 30% were computed from 735 INN antibodies. The number of motifs identified for our anti-TIGIT (B) and anti-TIM3 (C) candidates and their references are shown as colored lines are compared with the distribution of the INN antibodies shown in blue.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Solvent
Figure Legend Snippet: Aggregation parameters analysis. (A) Surface physicochemical patches. Surface properties (i.e. hydrophobicity, electrostatic forces, charges and shape) of the VH-VL pairs were computed and moderate (orange) to intense (red) regions were shown on the VH-VL structures. (B, C) Aggregation scores comparison with publicly-disclosed antibodies. The surface properties were used to train a model allowing to predict an aggregation score. Scores were computed for our anti-TIGIT (B) and anti-TIM3 (C) candidates and their references, and compared with the scores distribution computed from 735 INN antibodies (blue) and 31,712 patented antibodies (green).
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Humanness evaluation. A humanness score was computed from publicly available antibody sequences which allowed discrimination between human, humanized and non-human sequences (from chimeric antibodies). Separate scores were computed for the VH (A, C) and the VL (B, D) . The scores obtained for our anti-TIGIT (upper panels) and anti-TIM3 (lower panels) candidates are compared with the benchmark distributions.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Off-targets prediction. The numbers of predicted off-targets, either human (red) or non-human (blue), were computed for all FDA-approved antibodies and ranked as a probability of being recognized (high vs. medium). The number of off-targets predicted for our anti-TIGIT (left panel) and anti-TIM3 (right panel) candidates were compared with that scale.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Affinity evaluation and structural model definition of the antibody-antigen complexes. (A, B) Experimental competition assays. Pairwise competition assays of TIGIT binders (A) or anti-TIM3 antibodies (B) were performed by flow cytometry. Briefly, the Fc fragments of our human IgG1 candidates were replaced by mouse IgG2a Fc fragments. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with the Flag-tagged target gene and co-incubated the human IgG1-formatted and the mouse IgG2a-formatted candidates. In the case of TIGIT, the competition was also evaluated with its natural ligand CD155 fused to a mouse IgG2a Fc fragment. The target expression was monitored with a PE-coupled anti-Flag antibody and the binding of the human IgG1-formatted antibodies was followed with an APC-coupled antibody. The percentage of APC+PE+ cells (among the PE+ subset) was indicated as a color gradient. (C) Affinity predictions and structural model definition. The antibodies were docked on selected epitopes (indicated in the left boxes). The affinity of the obtained complexes was computed as the C-score (left column) which was a combination of PCC-score (middle column) and IR-score (right column). The upper panels show the affinity predicted for the anti-TIGIT candidates docked on 7VYT epitope. The middle and lower panels show the affinity predicted for the anti-TIM3 antibodies docked on 6TXZ and 7KQL epitope, respectively.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Transfection, Incubation, Expressing, Binding Assay